Certificate in
Information Security
Management
ISMS Requirements & Annex A Controls
Table of Contents
- Module 1: Introduction to ISO 27001 and the ISMS3
- Module 2: Clause 4 — Context of the Organization7
- Module 3: Clauses 5–6 — Leadership, Planning, and Risk Assessment12
- Module 4: Clauses 7–8 — Support, Operation, and Risk Treatment18
- Module 5: Clauses 9–10 — Performance Evaluation and Improvement24
- Module 6: Annex A Theme 1 — Organisational Controls (A.5)29
- Module 7: Annex A Theme 2 — People Controls (A.6)35
- Module 8: Annex A Theme 3 — Physical Controls (A.7)40
- Module 9: Annex A Theme 4 — Technological Controls (A.8)45
- Module 10: Statement of Applicability and Implementation53
- Assessment Guide58
1.1 What is Information Security?
Information security is the practice of protecting information and information systems from unauthorised access, use, disclosure, disruption, modification, or destruction. It is built on three foundational principles, collectively known as the CIA Triad:
| CIA Principle | Definition and Examples |
|---|---|
| Confidentiality | Ensuring information is accessible only to those authorised to access it. Examples: encryption of data at rest and in transit, access controls, classification schemes. |
| Integrity | Safeguarding the accuracy and completeness of information and processing methods. Examples: digital signatures, checksums, audit logs, version control. |
| Availability | Ensuring authorised users have access to information and systems when required. Examples: redundant systems, disaster recovery, backup procedures, DDoS protection. |
Modern information security extends beyond the CIA Triad to also address authenticity (verifying that an entity is who it claims to be), accountability (ensuring actions can be traced to an entity), non-repudiation (preventing a party from denying an action), and reliability (consistent performance).
1.2 Why ISO 27001?
ISO/IEC 27001 is the world's most widely adopted international standard for Information Security Management Systems. It provides a systematic, risk-based framework for managing sensitive information across an organisation. Adoption delivers multiple benefits:
| Benefit | Description |
|---|---|
| Competitive advantage | ISO 27001 certification is increasingly a requirement for government and enterprise contracts, particularly in ICT services, cloud computing, financial services, and healthcare. |
| Customer trust | Demonstrates that the organisation takes information security seriously — a significant differentiator in an environment of escalating data breaches. |
| Regulatory alignment | Provides a strong foundation for compliance with privacy and data protection regulations (GDPR, Australian Privacy Act, HIPAA, PCI DSS). |
| Risk reduction | Systematic identification and treatment of information security risks reduces the likelihood and impact of breaches, incidents, and business disruptions. |
| Internal discipline | Forces organisations to understand their information assets, who has access, and what controls protect them — frequently revealing significant gaps. |
| Insurance positioning | ISO 27001 certification can reduce cyber insurance premiums and improve the organisation's insurability. |
1.3 The ISO 27000 Family
| Standard | Role |
|---|---|
| ISO/IEC 27000 | Overview and vocabulary — defines terms used across the family |
| ISO/IEC 27001:2022 | ISMS requirements — the certifiable standard (this course) |
| ISO/IEC 27002:2022 | Code of practice — guidance on implementing Annex A controls |
| ISO/IEC 27005 | Information security risk management — detailed guidance on risk processes |
| ISO/IEC 27017 | Controls for cloud services |
| ISO/IEC 27018 | Protection of personally identifiable information (PII) in public clouds |
| ISO/IEC 27701 | Privacy information management — extension for GDPR/privacy compliance |
1.4 Structure of ISO 27001:2022
ISO 27001:2022 follows the Annex SL harmonised high-level structure used by all modern ISO management system standards (ISO 9001, ISO 14001, ISO 45001, ISO 55001). This makes integration with other management systems straightforward.
| Section | Content |
|---|---|
| Clauses 1–3 | Scope, normative references, terms and definitions |
| Clause 4 | Context of the organisation — understanding internal/external issues, stakeholders, and ISMS scope |
| Clause 5 | Leadership — top management commitment, IS policy, roles and responsibilities |
| Clause 6 | Planning — risk assessment, risk treatment, IS objectives |
| Clause 7 | Support — resources, competence, awareness, communication, documented information |
| Clause 8 | Operation — operational planning, risk assessment and treatment execution |
| Clause 9 | Performance evaluation — monitoring, measurement, internal audit, management review |
| Clause 10 | Improvement — nonconformity, corrective action, continual improvement |
| Annex A | Reference control objectives and controls — 93 controls in 4 themes (2022 revision) |
1.5 The 2022 Revision — What Changed
ISO 27001 was significantly revised in 2022 (from the 2013 version). Key changes include:
- Annex A restructured from 14 clauses and 114 controls to 4 themes and 93 controls
- 11 new controls added — many addressing cloud, threat intelligence, and ICT supply chain
- 58 controls merged (reducing redundancy); 1 control deleted
- Introduction of 5 control attributes: type (preventive/detective/corrective), information security properties (CIA), cybersecurity concepts (NIST CSF alignment), operational capabilities, and security domains
- Strengthened requirements for planning and preparing for information security incidents
- New clause text on threat intelligence and ICT supply chain security
2.1 The Foundation: Understanding Context
Clause 4 is the foundation of the entire ISMS. You cannot design an effective information security management system without first understanding the organisation's environment, its stakeholders, and the boundaries within which the ISMS will operate. An ISMS designed without proper context analysis will inevitably have blind spots — areas of significant risk that were never considered.
2.2 Clause 4.1 — Understanding the Organisation and its Context
2.2.1 External Issues
| Category | Information Security Relevance |
|---|---|
| Legal and regulatory | Privacy legislation (Australian Privacy Act, GDPR), data breach notification laws, sector-specific regulations (APRA CPS 234, HIPAA), criminal law equivalents |
| Threat landscape | Current cyber threat intelligence — ransomware trends, nation-state actors, supply chain attacks, zero-day exploits, phishing campaigns targeting your industry |
| Technology | Cloud computing adoption, mobile device proliferation, IoT, AI/ML, emerging cryptographic threats (post-quantum computing) |
| Market/competitive | Customer contractual security requirements, cyber insurance requirements, sector-specific security standards (PCI DSS, SOC 2) |
| Geopolitical | Country-of-origin data restrictions, sanctions, cross-border data transfer requirements, critical infrastructure designation |
| Physical/environmental | Natural disasters affecting data centres, supply chain disruptions for hardware and security software |
2.2.2 Internal Issues
- Organisational structure — how information flows, who has authority, how decisions are made
- Culture — is security seen as an enabler or a barrier? Is there psychological safety for reporting incidents?
- Strategy and objectives — what is the organisation trying to achieve, and how does information security enable that?
- Information assets — what information does the organisation hold, process, and transmit?
- Technology environment — existing IT infrastructure, legacy systems, cloud services, operational technology
- Human factors — workforce size, remote working arrangements, contractor usage, third-party access
- Existing security controls — what is already in place, and how effective is it?
- Past incidents — what security failures has the organisation experienced, and what was learned?
2.3 Clause 4.2 — Understanding Needs and Expectations of Interested Parties
| Interested Party | Typical Information Security Requirements |
|---|---|
| Customers | Data protection, confidentiality of their information, contractual security obligations, breach notification |
| Regulators | Compliance with specific legislation, incident reporting obligations, audit rights, data localisation |
| Shareholders/Owners | Cyber risk governance, security incident disclosure, protection of intellectual property |
| Employees | Clear security policies, secure working environment, privacy of personal information held by employer |
| Suppliers and partners | Mutual security obligations, supply chain security requirements, third-party access controls |
| Insurers | Evidence of security controls, incident response capability, security maturity assessment |
| Certification bodies | Conformance with ISO 27001 requirements, audit access, corrective action processes |
2.4 Clause 4.3 — Determining the Scope of the ISMS
2.4.1 Scope Decisions
- A narrow scope reduces the certification effort but also reduces its value to customers who need assurance across broader operations
- A broad scope requires more rigorous implementation but provides stronger assurance and is often required by major enterprise customers
- Interfaces and dependencies must be considered — an ISMS scope that excludes a critical supplier or cloud provider may leave significant risk unaddressed
2.4.2 Typical Scope Elements
- Organisational units: Which business units, departments, or legal entities are in scope
- Locations: Which physical sites, including remote working arrangements and cloud infrastructure
- Information assets: Which information types, systems, and processes are covered
- Technology: Which IT systems, applications, networks, and devices are in scope
- Interfaces: How the scoped area interacts with out-of-scope areas and third parties
2.5 Clause 4.4 — Information Security Management System
This clause establishes the core obligation: the ISMS must be established (documented and designed), implemented (actually operating in practice), maintained (kept current and effective), and continually improved. The four-word sequence — establish, implement, maintain, improve — maps directly to the Plan-Do-Check-Act (PDCA) cycle that underpins all ISO management systems.
3.1 Clause 5 — Leadership
3.1.1 Clause 5.1 — Leadership and Commitment
Information security failures are frequently attributed to a lack of genuine leadership commitment. When senior leaders treat security as an IT problem rather than a business risk, security teams lack the authority, resources, and organisational backing to implement effective controls.
3.1.2 Evidence of Leadership Commitment
| Leadership Behaviour | What Good Looks Like |
|---|---|
| Resource allocation | Adequate budget for security tooling, staff, training, and external support — proportionate to the organisation's risk profile |
| Governance participation | Board and/or executive committee receives regular IS risk reporting and makes security risk decisions |
| Policy ownership | Top management personally signs the information security policy and reviews it annually |
| Security culture | Security is a standing agenda item in executive meetings; incidents reviewed at leadership level |
| Accountability | Named CISO, IS Manager, or equivalent with direct access to executive leadership |
| Integration | Security requirements embedded in new project approvals, procurement decisions, and change management |
3.1.3 Clause 5.2 — Policy
A conforming IS policy must: be approved and signed by top management; reference commitment to confidentiality, integrity, and availability; state the ISMS scope; commit to risk-based security management; commit to meeting regulatory and contractual requirements; and commit to continual improvement.
3.1.4 Clause 5.3 — Roles, Responsibilities and Authorities
| Role | Responsibilities |
|---|---|
| CISO / IS Manager | Overall accountability for the ISMS. Reports to executive. Leads IS risk management, policy, audit, and incident response. |
| IS Steering Committee | Executive-level governance body. Reviews IS performance, approves IS risk decisions, sets IS strategy. |
| IS Risk Owner | Named individual accountable for each IS risk — accepts, transfers, or directs treatment of specific risks. |
| System/Data Owner | Responsible for a specific system or data asset — defines access requirements, approves access, monitors usage. |
| IT Security Operations | Day-to-day operation of security controls — monitoring, patching, vulnerability management, incident detection. |
| All staff | Responsible for following IS policies, completing awareness training, and reporting security incidents and concerns. |
3.2 Clause 6 — Planning
3.2.2 Clause 6.1.2 — Information Security Risk Assessment
3.2.3 Risk Assessment Methodology
- Establish risk criteria: Define what constitutes risk acceptance — what likelihood × impact threshold requires treatment.
- Asset/scenario identification: Identify information assets and scenarios (threat × vulnerability combinations) that could compromise CIA.
- Threat identification: What threat actors and events are relevant? (External attackers, malicious insiders, accidental actions, natural events, system failures)
- Vulnerability identification: What weaknesses exist that could be exploited? (Unpatched software, weak passwords, inadequate physical security, untrained staff)
- Consequence assessment: If a threat exploits a vulnerability, what is the impact on CIA? Assess financial, reputational, legal, and operational consequences.
- Likelihood assessment: How probable is the threat event, considering existing controls?
- Risk level calculation: Combine likelihood and consequence to produce a risk level using a risk matrix.
- Risk evaluation: Compare risk levels against criteria. Determine which risks require treatment.
3.2.4 Clause 6.1.3 — Information Security Risk Treatment
Risk treatment options: Avoid (eliminate the risk source entirely); Reduce/Modify (apply Annex A controls); Share/Transfer (cyber insurance, outsourcing, contractual transfer); Accept/Retain (documented conscious decision that residual risk is within criteria).
3.2.5 Clause 6.2 — Information Security Objectives
| Example IS Objective | Measure |
|---|---|
| Reduce phishing susceptibility | Phishing simulation click rate < 5% by Q4 |
| Achieve patch currency | 95% of critical vulnerabilities patched within 14 days of release |
| Improve incident response time | Mean time to detect (MTTD) < 4 hours for high-severity incidents |
| Secure supply chain | 100% of critical suppliers assessed against security questionnaire annually |
| Protect personal data | Zero personal data breaches involving inadequate access controls by year end |
4.1 Clause 7 — Support
4.1.2 Clause 7.2 — Competence
| Competence Area | Examples of Evidence |
|---|---|
| Technical security | CISSP, CISM, CISA, CEH, CompTIA Security+, cloud security certifications |
| Risk management | ISO 27005 training, CRISC, IS risk assessment methodology training |
| Audit | ISO 27001 Lead Auditor certification, internal audit training |
| Privacy/Legal | CIPP, privacy law training, GDPR practitioner certification |
| Incident response | SANS GIAC certifications, incident response exercises |
| Awareness training | Completion records for all-staff security awareness training (annual minimum) |
4.1.3 Clause 7.3 — Awareness
Effective awareness programs include:
- Annual all-staff security awareness training (mandatory, tracked to completion)
- Regular phishing simulations with targeted training for those who fall for simulations
- Role-specific training for higher-risk roles (finance, HR, executives, IT administrators)
- Security communications — monthly security tips, incident alerts, policy reminders
- New joiner induction — security awareness as part of onboarding
- Targeted briefings when new threats emerge
4.1.5 Clause 7.5 — Documented Information (Mandatory Documents)
| Mandatory Document / Record | Clause Reference |
|---|---|
| ISMS scope | 4.3 |
| Information security policy | 5.2 |
| IS risk assessment process and results | 6.1.2 |
| IS risk treatment plan | 6.1.3 |
| Statement of Applicability (SoA) | 6.1.3 |
| IS objectives | 6.2 |
| Evidence of competence | 7.2 |
| Evidence of monitoring and measurement results | 9.1 |
| Internal audit program and results | 9.2 |
| Evidence of management review results | 9.3 |
| Evidence of nonconformities and corrective actions | 10.1 |
4.2 Clause 8 — Operation
4.2.1 Clause 8.1 — Operational Planning and Control
This requires: documented procedures for all key security processes; technical configuration standards for systems, networks, and devices; process controls built into workflows; and evidence retention through logs, reports, and records demonstrating controls are operating.
4.2.2 Clause 8.2 — Information Security Risk Assessment (Operational)
The organisation must perform IS risk assessments at planned intervals or when significant changes occur. Triggers for reassessment include: significant changes to IT systems; new business activities or services; following a significant security incident; changes in the regulatory environment; and major changes to the threat landscape.
4.2.3 Clause 8.3 — Information Security Risk Treatment
This clause requires that the risk treatment plan is actually implemented. Every risk treatment action agreed in Clause 6.1.3 must be executed, tracked, and evidenced. The most common failure mode: organisations conduct excellent risk assessments and produce detailed treatment plans, then fail to implement the treatments due to resource constraints or lack of accountability.
5.1 Clause 9.1 — Monitoring, Measurement, Analysis and Evaluation
| Metric Category | Example Measures |
|---|---|
| Vulnerability management | Mean time to patch critical vulnerabilities; % of systems with current patches; number of open critical vulnerabilities |
| Access control | Number of accounts with excessive privileges; % of accounts with MFA enabled; number of orphaned accounts |
| Incident detection | Mean time to detect (MTTD); number of security events per day; false positive rate in SIEM |
| Incident response | Mean time to respond (MTTR); number of incidents by severity; % meeting SLA |
| Awareness | Phishing simulation click rate; % staff completing annual security training |
| Compliance | % of controls fully implemented; number of open audit findings; days to close findings |
| Third-party security | % of critical suppliers with completed security assessments |
| Business continuity | RTO/RPO met in test exercises; backup success rate; time since last DR test |
5.1.3 Clause 9.2 — Internal Audit
| Audit Program Element | Guidance for ISO 27001 |
|---|---|
| Frequency | All ISMS clauses covered annually. Annex A controls may rotate across a 2–3 year cycle based on risk. Higher-risk controls warrant more frequent audit. |
| Evidence review | Document review; interviews; technical testing (check firewall rules, review access logs, verify backup restores) |
| Finding categories | Major NC: System failure. Minor NC: Single instance departure. Observation: Risk of future NC. OFI: Enhancement beyond conformance. |
| Reporting | Report to IS management and steering committee. Significant findings to executive/board. All findings tracked to closure. |
5.1.4 Clause 9.3 — Management Review
5.2 Clause 10 — Improvement
5.2.2 Root Cause Analysis for IS Nonconformities
| Nonconformity Example | Likely Root Causes to Investigate |
|---|---|
| Phishing email clicked by finance staff leading to credential theft | Inadequate awareness training; no MFA; no email filtering for malicious links |
| Unpatched critical vulnerability exploited | Patch management process gaps; no vulnerability scanning; insufficient resources |
| Unauthorized data access by former employee | Access revocation process failed; delayed HR-IT notification; no access review |
| Third-party supplier breached causing data exposure | Inadequate supplier security assessment; no contractual security requirements |
| Backup restoration failure during incident response | Backup process not tested; backups corrupted; restoration procedure not documented |
6.1 Overview of Organisational Controls
Annex A Theme 1 contains 37 controls addressing the governance, policy, and process dimensions of information security. Your demo2 ES ERP Compliance Framework record contains three implemented controls from this theme: A.5.1 (Information Security Policy), A.5.2 (IS Roles and Responsibilities), and A.5.3 (Segregation of Duties) — all with implementation status: Implemented.
6.2 A.5.1 — Information Security Policies (Implemented)
6.2.1 Policy Architecture
ISO 27001:2022 distinguishes between the overarching IS policy (Clause 5.2) and topic-specific policies (Annex A). Topic-specific policies include:
- Access control policy — who can access what, under what conditions
- Acceptable use policy — how staff may use IT systems and information
- Information classification policy — how information is categorised and handled by classification level
- Cryptography policy — when and how encryption is used
- Incident management policy — how security incidents are reported and managed
- Remote access and working policy — security requirements for remote and hybrid work
- Supplier security policy — minimum security requirements for third-party suppliers
6.3 A.5.2 — Information Security Roles and Responsibilities (Implemented)
Role allocation must cover: ownership of the ISMS as a whole; ownership of each information asset; responsibility for each Annex A control area; incident response roles (Incident Manager, Technical Lead, Communications, Legal/Compliance); audit responsibilities; and supplier relationship management from an IS perspective.
6.4 A.5.3 — Segregation of Duties (Implemented)
| Conflicting Duty Pair | Segregation Mechanism |
|---|---|
| Code development / production deployment | Change advisory board approval; separate deployment role; automated pipeline with approval gates |
| Access request / access provisioning | IT Security approves requests; IT Operations provisions access; regular access reviews by system owners |
| Financial transaction initiation / approval | Dual authorisation in financial systems; dollar thresholds requiring second approver |
| Security monitoring / security administration | SOC/monitoring team separate from IT administration team |
| User management / audit of user activity | IT administration cannot delete their own audit logs; SIEM monitored by independent security team |
6.5 Selected Additional A.5 Controls
6.5.1 A.5.7 — Threat Intelligence (New in 2022)
Organisations must collect and analyse information about information security threats to produce actionable threat intelligence. Sources include: vendor security advisories, CERT/CISA bulletins, industry ISACs, commercial threat intelligence feeds, and dark web monitoring.
6.5.2 A.5.19–A.5.22 — ICT Supply Chain Security (Enhanced in 2022)
Supply chain security has been significantly strengthened in 2022. Controls cover: identifying and managing IS risks in ICT supply chains; defining security requirements for supplier agreements; managing and monitoring supplier service delivery; and addressing security in cloud service agreements. This reflects the growing recognition of supply chain attacks (SolarWinds, Kaseya) as a major threat vector.
6.5.3 A.5.23 — IS for Cloud Services (New in 2022)
A new control specifically addressing information security in cloud computing. Organisations must establish processes for acquisition, use, management, and exit from cloud services. This includes: cloud provider security assessment; contractual security requirements; data classification in cloud environments; and cloud exit strategies.
7.1 Why People Controls Matter
People are simultaneously the most important security asset and the most significant security vulnerability in any organisation. Technical controls can be bypassed, defeated, or rendered ineffective by human behaviour — whether through mistakes, negligence, deliberate action, or social engineering. Theme 2 addresses information security throughout the employment lifecycle and into the remote working environment.
7.2 A.6.1 — Screening
| Role Risk Level | Typical Screening Requirements |
|---|---|
| Standard roles | Identity verification, right to work check, employment history verification, character references |
| Elevated access roles (IT admins, finance) | Above plus criminal history check, qualification verification, credit check |
| Executive and privileged roles | Above plus enhanced criminal check, directorship search, adverse media check, professional registration verification |
| Ongoing screening | Periodic re-screening for high-privilege roles; monitoring for criminal charges or financial distress indicators |
7.4 A.6.3 — Information Security Awareness, Education and Training
- Annual mandatory IS awareness training — foundational content for all staff, with completion tracked
- Role-specific training — deeper training for IT, finance, HR, and executive staff
- Phishing simulations — regular simulated phishing; staff who click receive immediate targeted education
- Micro-learning — short, regular security messages, security newsletter
- Security champions program — IS-aware individuals embedded in business units
- Effectiveness measurement — tracking behaviour change, not just training completion
7.5 A.6.5 — Responsibilities After Termination or Change of Employment
7.6 A.6.7 — Remote Working
| Remote Working Risk | Control Measures |
|---|---|
| Eavesdropping on unsecured Wi-Fi | Mandatory VPN for all remote access to corporate systems; prohibition on public Wi-Fi without VPN |
| Screen viewing by third parties | Clear screen policy for public spaces; use of privacy screens; screen lock on timeout |
| Device theft or loss | Full disk encryption on all endpoints; remote wipe capability; PIN/biometric lock |
| Home network compromise | Baseline home router security requirements; separation of work and personal devices; regular guidance |
| Cloud service misuse | Approved cloud service list; DLP controls; prohibition on personal cloud storage for corporate data |
8.1 Why Physical Security Underpins Information Security
Physical security is often treated as an IT afterthought, but it is foundational to information security. All logical security controls can be defeated if an attacker can gain physical access to servers, network equipment, or workstations. A technically sophisticated cyber defence is rendered meaningless if someone can walk into the server room and remove a hard drive.
8.2 A.7.1 — Physical Security Perimeters
| Perimeter Zone | Typical Controls |
|---|---|
| Outer perimeter (site) | Perimeter fencing/walls, CCTV, external lighting, visitor management at main gate |
| Building entry | Electronic access control, reception staffing, visitor sign-in and escort, anti-tailgating measures |
| General office areas | Badge access, no tailgating, clear desk policy, visitor escort within offices |
| IT areas (server rooms, comms rooms) | Stronger electronic access, biometric or two-factor entry, entry/exit logging, CCTV, no unescorted visitors |
| High-security areas (data centres) | Mantrap/airlock entry, dual-person authorisation, full-body access control, 24/7 guard presence |
8.4 A.7.7 — Clear Desk and Clear Screen
- Sensitive documents secured in locked drawers or cabinets when not in use — not left on desks overnight
- Screen lock activated when leaving workstation (maximum timeout: 10–15 minutes)
- Printers checked and cleared — sensitive documents not left in printer output trays
- Whiteboards and meeting room screens cleared of sensitive information after use
8.6 A.7.14 — Secure Disposal or Re-use of Equipment
- Documented disposal procedure for all equipment containing storage
- Secure erasure using DoD 5220.22-M or equivalent overwriting standard, or physical destruction for highly sensitive media
- Certificate of destruction for third-party disposal services
- Asset register updated on disposal
9.1 Overview of Technological Controls
Annex A Theme 4 contains 34 controls. Your ES ERP Compliance Framework record contains 9 controls from this theme:
| Control | Title | Status |
|---|---|---|
| A.8.1 | User Endpoint Devices | Partially Implemented |
| A.8.2 | Privileged Access Rights | Implemented |
| A.8.3 | Information Access Restriction | Implemented |
| A.8.4 | Access to Source Code | Implemented |
| A.8.5 | Secure Authentication | Partially Implemented |
| A.8.10 | Information Deletion | Implemented |
| A.8.11 | Data Masking | Not Implemented |
| A.8.23 | Web Filtering | Implemented |
| A.8.28 | Secure Coding | Partially Implemented |
9.2 A.8.1 — User Endpoint Devices (Partially Implemented)
| Endpoint Control | Implementation Requirements |
|---|---|
| Device encryption | Full disk encryption mandatory on all endpoint devices. BitLocker (Windows), FileVault (macOS). Encryption key management documented. |
| Endpoint protection | Anti-malware software with real-time protection and automatic updates. Next-gen EDR preferred over legacy AV. |
| Patch management | Automated patching for OS and critical applications. Critical patches deployed within 14 days; high within 30 days. |
| Device management | MDM or UEM for all corporate devices. Enables remote wipe, policy enforcement, app management. |
| Asset inventory | Register of all endpoint devices with owner, OS version, encryption status, MDM enrolment status. |
9.3 A.8.2 — Privileged Access Rights (Implemented)
- Privileged account inventory: All privileged accounts documented — who has them, what they access, why
- Least privilege principle: Privileged access granted only to the minimum scope required
- Separate privileged accounts: Administrators use a standard account for routine tasks; separate privileged account for administrative tasks
- PAM solution: Vaulting of privileged credentials, just-in-time access, session recording and monitoring
- Regular review: Privileged access reviewed at least quarterly
- Shared account prohibition: Generic shared administrator accounts prohibited
9.5 A.8.4 — Access to Source Code (Implemented)
- Source code repository access controlled — only developers working on a project can access its code
- Branch protection — production branches require pull request approval; no direct commits to main/master
- Code review requirement — all code changes reviewed by a second developer before merge
- Audit log — all access to and changes in the repository logged and retained
9.6 A.8.5 — Secure Authentication (Partially Implemented)
| Authentication Factor | Examples and Security Level |
|---|---|
| Something you know | Password, PIN. Weakest factor — susceptible to phishing, guessing, database breach. |
| Something you have | Hardware token (YubiKey), authenticator app (TOTP), SMS OTP. Stronger — requires physical access. |
| Something you are | Fingerprint, facial recognition, iris scan. Biometric — cannot be reset if compromised. |
| Multi-factor authentication (MFA) | Combining two or more factors. CISA data shows MFA blocks 99.9% of automated attacks. |
| Passwordless authentication | FIDO2/WebAuthn, certificate-based. Eliminates passwords entirely — highest security for supported use cases. |
9.8 A.8.11 — Data Masking (Not Implemented)
Data masking techniques include: Static data masking (creates a masked copy for non-production use); Dynamic data masking (masks data at the presentation layer in real-time); Tokenisation (replaces sensitive data with a non-sensitive token); and Pseudonymisation (replaces identifying information with artificial identifiers — recognised by GDPR as a privacy-enhancing technique).
9.10 A.8.28 — Secure Coding (Partially Implemented)
| SDLC Phase | Security Activities |
|---|---|
| Requirements | Define security requirements; conduct threat modelling; identify compliance obligations |
| Design | Security architecture review; attack surface analysis; security design patterns |
| Development | Secure coding standards; OWASP Top 10 training; developer security tools (IDE plugins, SCA) |
| Testing | Static Application Security Testing (SAST); Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST); penetration testing |
| Deployment | Secure configuration; secrets management (no hardcoded credentials); dependency vulnerability check |
| Operations | Vulnerability monitoring; security patch process; incident response capability; security logging |
9.10.2 OWASP Top 10
- A01: Broken Access Control — users can act outside their intended permissions
- A02: Cryptographic Failures — sensitive data exposed due to weak or absent encryption
- A03: Injection — SQL injection, command injection, LDAP injection
- A04: Insecure Design — security not considered in architecture decisions
- A05: Security Misconfiguration — default credentials, unnecessary features enabled
- A06: Vulnerable and Outdated Components — using libraries with known vulnerabilities
- A07: Identification and Authentication Failures — weak passwords, missing MFA
- A08: Software and Data Integrity Failures — insecure CI/CD pipelines
- A09: Security Logging and Monitoring Failures — insufficient logging to detect breaches
- A10: Server-Side Request Forgery — forcing servers to make unintended requests
10.1 The Statement of Applicability (SoA)
The Statement of Applicability (SoA) is one of the most important — and most distinctive — documents in ISO 27001. It declares, for each of the 93 Annex A controls, whether the control is applicable to the organisation, whether it is implemented, and the justification for inclusion or exclusion.
10.1.2 Your ES ERP SoA — Current Status
| Control | Title | Status |
|---|---|---|
| A.5.1 | Information Security Policy | Implemented |
| A.5.2 | IS Roles and Responsibilities | Implemented |
| A.5.3 | Segregation of Duties | Implemented |
| A.8.1 | User Endpoint Devices | Partially Implemented |
| A.8.2 | Privileged Access Rights | Implemented |
| A.8.3 | Information Access Restriction | Implemented |
| A.8.4 | Access to Source Code | Implemented |
| A.8.5 | Secure Authentication | Partially Implemented |
| A.8.10 | Information Deletion | Implemented |
| A.8.11 | Data Masking | Not Implemented |
| A.8.23 | Web Filtering | Implemented |
| A.8.28 | Secure Coding | Partially Implemented |
10.3 The Certification Process
| Stage | Description |
|---|---|
| Stage 1 Audit (Documentation Review) | Certification auditor reviews ISMS documentation — scope, policy, risk assessment, SoA, key procedures. Identifies major gaps that would prevent Stage 2. Results in a Stage 2 readiness assessment. |
| Stage 2 Audit (Conformance Audit) | Auditor assesses whether the ISMS is implemented in practice and is effective. Interviews staff, reviews records, observes processes, tests controls. 2–10 days depending on scope. |
| Certification Decision | Certification body reviews findings and makes certification decision. Certificate issued for a 3-year cycle (subject to annual surveillance). |
| Annual Surveillance Audit (Years 1 and 2) | Focused audit confirming continued conformance and improvement. Covers high-risk areas and any previous findings. |
| Recertification Audit (Year 3) | Full re-audit to renew certification for a further 3-year cycle. Similar in scope to the original certification audit. |
10.5 Connecting ISO 27001 to Other Frameworks
| Framework | Relationship to ISO 27001 |
|---|---|
| NIST Cybersecurity Framework (CSF) | Strong alignment — NIST CSF's five functions (Identify, Protect, Detect, Respond, Recover) map well to ISO 27001 controls. |
| SOC 2 | Complementary — ISO 27001 certification can reduce the effort of SOC 2 attestation for overlapping controls. |
| GDPR / Australian Privacy Act | ISO 27001 provides strong technical and operational controls for privacy compliance. ISO 27701 extends ISO 27001 specifically for privacy management. |
| APRA CPS 234 | Australian banking regulator's IS standard. ISO 27001 certification acknowledged as evidence of mature IS capability by APRA. |
| Essential Eight (ACSC) | Australian Cyber Security Centre's baseline. E8 maturity levels 2 and 3 align strongly with ISO 27001 Annex A technological controls. |
Assessment Overview
This Certificate program uses a blended assessment approach testing both theoretical understanding of ISO 27001:2022 requirements and the practical ability to design, assess, and improve an ISMS.
ISMS Design Exercise
Task: Using a provided organisational scenario and content from Modules 1–5:
- Context analysis (Clause 4.1): Identify the top five external and five internal issues relevant to the ISMS.
- Stakeholder analysis (Clause 4.2): Identify five key stakeholders and their IS requirements.
- Draft an ISMS scope statement (Clause 4.3): Define scope boundaries and justified exclusions.
- Risk assessment extract (Clause 6.1.2): Complete a risk assessment for three realistic IS risk scenarios.
- Information security objectives (Clause 6.2): Define three SMART IS objectives, each with a measurable target.
Deliverable: Structured document of approximately 1,500 words plus tables. ISO 27001 clause references required.
Annex A Control Analysis
Task: Using a provided case study and drawing on Modules 6–9:
- Control gap identification: Identify which Annex A controls are absent or inadequate. Map gaps to the four themes (A.5, A.6, A.7, A.8).
- Statement of Applicability extract: For 10 controls (5 implemented, 3 partially implemented, 2 not implemented), complete SoA entries including justification, status, and implementing reference.
- Risk treatment: For the three highest-priority control gaps, design a treatment plan including specific actions, ownership, resources, timelines, and residual risk estimate.
- Control effectiveness assessment: For two implemented controls, describe what evidence an internal auditor would look for to verify the control is operating effectively.
Deliverable: Written analysis and completed SoA extract, approximately 1,800 words total. Annex A control references required throughout.
Theory Examination
- Section A: 20 multiple-choice questions on ISO 27001 definitions, clause requirements, Annex A controls, and the CIA triad (20 marks)
- Section B: 4 short-answer questions (150–200 words each) applying ISO 27001 concepts to scenarios (40 marks)
- Section C: 1 extended response — design an internal audit program for an ISMS, and explain what evidence you would seek to verify conformance with three specific Annex A controls (40 marks)
Key Study Areas
- The CIA Triad — definition and examples of controls for each property
- The 2022 Annex A restructure — 4 themes, 93 controls, 11 new controls
- The Statement of Applicability — what it must contain, and why exclusions must be justified
- The risk assessment process (Clause 6.1.2) — all steps from criteria to evaluation
- Risk treatment options — avoid, reduce, share, accept — and when each is appropriate
- Mandatory documented information — know the full list (Module 4 table)
- The 9 controls from your ES ERP record — understand each at implementation depth
- MFA types and why phishing-resistant MFA is the gold standard
- Segregation of duties examples — be able to identify conflicting duty pairs
- The certification process — Stage 1 and Stage 2 audits, surveillance, recertification
- How ISO 27001 relates to GDPR, NIST CSF, SOC 2, and Australian regulations (APRA CPS 234, Essential Eight)
